In China, schools in cities and towns tend to receive more resources from the government partly because they are more visible to the public. Meanwhile some schools in certain isolated rural areas have tremendous financial difficulties in keeping going. CTEF has chosen to spend most of its resources supporting projects for smaller schools in some rural areas. The relatively low living cost in these remote areas maximizes the buying power of the US dollars donated to help these schools.
CTEF evaluates whether requests from schools are carefully made, well planned for a limited budget, and meeting CTEF¡¯s strict criteria. With experience on dozens of projects within several provinces, CTEF collected sufficient information on school building renovation and availability of school supplies. New requests are compared to similar requests from the same region. Any request showing higher construction costs per square meter is contacted to provide explanation. In one case, a school in YunNan Province provided a slightly higher than expected construction costs and explained that due to lack of paved road in the area, all building materials would be transported by ox carts. Realizing the problem, CTEF approved the request.
In another request, a rural school asked for fund to rebuild its classrooms. The photographs received from the school showed the front side of the building in fairly good shape. CTEF contacted the school asking why rebuilding was necessary. It turned out that the rear part of the school was built of mud and was in deplorable condition. CTEF approved this request after receiving more photographs to cover the back part.
Occasionally, requests don't show detailed plans on how the funding will be spent. In September 2003, CTEF received an application from HongWei Elementary School in HeKou County, Yunnan Province for RMB 104,000. The funding was for refurbishing a hallway and ceiling, windows and doors, a student dining hall, and the school playing field. After careful deliberation, the request was rejected based on two points: lack of a detailed cost breakdown and much higher cost estimates than similar projects CTEF had supported in other schools. In short, the request showed too much unknown and the risk that CTEF preferred not to take.
Information about surrounding villages of the schools is also helpful in evaluation. CTEF sometimes asked local representatives for supporting information as well before making any decisions. If not mentioned in the request, CTEF urges the schools to seek support from government and other local sources. CTEF believes that it is important for local people to participate in supporting their own children¡¯s education as well as seek outside resources. |